2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1972 Renault 15
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 15 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1972 Renault 15. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 513 kg more than 1972 Renault 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Renault 15. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Renault 15.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1972 Renault 15 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | 15 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |