2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1972 Seat 1500
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1972 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 Seat 1500.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1972 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Ranger | 1500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2660 mm |