2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1972 Subaru 1400
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Subaru 1400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1972 Subaru 1400 | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Ranger | 1400 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1361 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |