2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1972 TVR M
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 TVR M would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1972 TVR M. (105 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 TVR M.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 TVR M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 TVR M. (180 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 TVR M.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1972 TVR M | |
| Make | Ford | TVR |
| Model | Ranger | M |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2290 mm |
