2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1973 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Ranger | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
