2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 1 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (367 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 367 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1244 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2700 mm |
