2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1975 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1975 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1975 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1975 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1975 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ranger | Grand Wagoneer |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2800 mm |