2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1976 Seat 127
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Seat 127 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1976 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1976 Seat 127.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Seat 127. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1976 Seat 127 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Ranger | 127 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 903 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 63 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |
