2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1976 TVR 3000
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 TVR 3000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1976 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | Ford | TVR |
| Model | Ranger | 3000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 58 L |
