2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1978 Mazda 929
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 929.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1978 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 929 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2620 mm |