2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 2046 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1978 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Colt |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2856 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2310 mm |