2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1979 Renault 5
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault 5 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1979 Renault 5. (159 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1979 Renault 5.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Renault 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Renault 5. (221 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1979 Renault 5 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ranger | 5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 56 L |