2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 822 kg more than 1979 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 66 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |