2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 929 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |