2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1980 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 565 kg more than 1980 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1980 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Ranger | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2260 mm |
