2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Tercel. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Tercel.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Toyota Tercel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | Tercel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2510 mm |