2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1981 Renault 18
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 18 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1981 Renault 18. (66 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 18.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Renault 18. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 18. (124 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1981 Renault 18 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | 18 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2068 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 89 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2450 mm |
