2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1981 Triumph TR7
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Triumph TR7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Triumph TR7 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1981 Triumph TR7. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1981 Triumph TR7.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Triumph TR7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Triumph TR7. (211 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Triumph TR7.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1981 Triumph TR7 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | TR7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 55 L |