2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 2092 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Ranger | 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2160 mm |
