2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1981 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 1500.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1981 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Ranger | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2430 mm |
