2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Audi 4000
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1982 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Ranger | 4000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2550 mm |