2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Lancia Gamma
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Gamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Gamma would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Gamma. (116 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Gamma.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lancia Gamma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Gamma. (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Gamma.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1982 Lancia Gamma | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Ranger | Gamma |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 59 L |