2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
Model | Ranger | Murena |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 116 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2440 mm |