2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 358 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | 323 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1071 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2370 mm |
