2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mercury Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Ranger | Lynx |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2400 mm |