2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Ranger | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2680 mm |
