2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 9 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1983 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | 9 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1107 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 38 L |
