2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Renault Siete
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault Siete would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1983 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Siete.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Renault Siete. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1983 Renault Siete | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ranger | Siete |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1106 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 44 HP |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2540 mm |
