2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1983 Talbot 1510. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Talbot 1510.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Talbot 1510. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Talbot 1510. (122 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1983 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | Ford | Talbot |
Model | Ranger | 1510 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 324 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 76.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 40 L |