2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1984 Ford GT
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford GT would be higher. Both 2006 Ford Ranger and 1984 Ford GT are equipped with a 2,299 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1984 Ford GT. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford GT.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Ford GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford GT. (203 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford GT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1984 Ford GT | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | GT |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2590 mm |