2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1984 Holden Camira
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1984 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1984 Holden Camira.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Holden Camira. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1984 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ranger | Camira |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2580 mm |
