2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1984 Opel Kadett
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1984 Opel Kadett. (90 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1984 Opel Kadett.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Opel Kadett. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Opel Kadett. (124 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Opel Kadett.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1984 Opel Kadett | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Ranger | Kadett |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2520 mm |