2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1984 Peugeot 205
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Peugeot 205. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Peugeot 205 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1984 Peugeot 205. (44 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1984 Peugeot 205.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Peugeot 205. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Peugeot 205. (75 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Peugeot 205.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1984 Peugeot 205 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | 205 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 75 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2430 mm |