2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1984 Skoda L
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1984 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1984 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 420 kg more than 1984 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1984 Skoda L | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Ranger | L |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 828 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 38 L |
