2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 52 kg more than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (367 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Ranger | CJ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 367 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1244 kg | 1296 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2380 mm |
