2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1985 Peugeot 309
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Peugeot 309. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Peugeot 309 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1985 Peugeot 309. (54 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1985 Peugeot 309. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1992 kg more than 1985 Peugeot 309. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Peugeot 309, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Peugeot 309. (87 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Peugeot 309.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1985 Peugeot 309 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | 309 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |