2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1687 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Ranger | Sundance |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2862 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2470 mm |