2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1985 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1985 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1985 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 865 kg more than 1985 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Skoda Rapid R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1985 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Ranger | Rapid R |
Year Released | 2006 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2850 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |