2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1987 Mazda 929
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1987 Mazda 929. (163 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1987 Mazda 929.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mazda 929. (247 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1987 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 929 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 247 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2720 mm |