2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1988 TVR S2
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 TVR S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 TVR S2 would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 TVR S2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 TVR S2 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 TVR S2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 258 kg more than 1988 TVR S2.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 TVR S2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 TVR S2. (233 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 TVR S2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1988 TVR S2 | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | Ranger | S2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2290 mm |