2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1989 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1989 Toyota Celica. (159 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1989 Toyota Celica.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Toyota Celica. (190 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1989 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2380 mm |