2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1989 TVR S2
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 TVR S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 TVR S2 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 TVR S2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 TVR S2 (151 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 TVR S2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 TVR S2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 TVR S2 (220 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1989 TVR S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1989 TVR S2 | |
| Make | Ford | TVR |
| Model | Ranger | S2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2290 mm |
