2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1989 Volvo 460
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 460 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1989 Volvo 460. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1989 Volvo 460.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Volvo 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volvo 460. (175 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volvo 460.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1989 Volvo 460 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 460 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 83.5 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 60 L |