2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1989 Volvo 760
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Volvo 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Volvo 760 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1989 Volvo 760. (163 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1989 Volvo 760.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Volvo 760. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Volvo 760. (263 Nm @ 3450 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Volvo 760.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1989 Volvo 760 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 760 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 2314 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 263 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3450 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2780 mm |