2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1991 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1991 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1991 Mini MK VI.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Mini MK VI. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1991 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Ranger | MK VI |
Year Released | 2006 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2040 mm |