2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1992 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Mustang |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2560 mm |