2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Holden Apollo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | Apollo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2610 mm |