2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Honda Accord
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Honda Accord would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Honda Accord (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Honda Accord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Honda Accord. (199 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1992 Honda Accord | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ranger | Accord |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 199 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2730 mm |