2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Honda Accord
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Honda Accord would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1992 Honda Accord. (134 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Honda Accord.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Honda Accord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Honda Accord. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1992 Honda Accord | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ranger | Accord |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |