2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 626 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2620 mm |